Archive

Archive for the ‘Hockey’ Category

September 11, 2007 Comments off

Top Ten Hockey Bloopers
http://youtube.com/v/tX5hQeD71ns
It’s almost time for hockey season again. As a warm up, here’s an interesting video of hockey bloopers. Canes are in there twice, once in a positive (handle that puck Ty… Handle it…) and once in a negative (poor Wallin).

Categories: Hockey

Must be convenient

August 15, 2007 Comments off

My how it must be convenient to choose when you go to jail for DUI and leaving the scene…

Categories: Hockey, Ramblings

Good old Internet hate…

August 6, 2007 Comments off

While playing with Connor and God of War II fill the void until hockey season starts back again.  I was reminded today about divealanche.com.  A whole site dedicated to the hate and ridicule of the Colorado Avalanche.  Personally I inherited my hate for Roy from Scott and me being a closet Brodeur fan doesn’t help.   But the site is still funny… especially this part.

Categories: Hockey, Ramblings

Even the fighters must be heard

June 13, 2007 Comments off

This is a great idea.

I am not sure many of these screaming fans would want their own boys becoming fighters, I would think they would want them to become more like the old Wendel Clark and Rick Tocchets of the world. Get rid of the instigator rule, and mandate ice time. This will make hockey a better game to watch, fights will still be prevalent.

They tried the instigator rule, it obviously hasn’t worked other than creating more cheap shots it’s high time to try something else.  This is as good an idea as I’ve heard.

Categories: Hockey

Conference Finals

May 10, 2007 Comments off

So my batting average took a hit during the conference semi’s going a mean 2-4 (with 1 series called correctly on the number of games), but that was then, this is now.  On to the conference finals!

Eastern Conference

(1) Buffalo Sabres vs. (4) Ottawa Senators

    The conventional wisdom is that Buffalo hasn’t played up to their ability, except perhaps game 6 of the Rangers series.  They’ve been fairly content to play the other teams game and do it just better enough to win, or get down a couple of goals and turn on the Buffalo style and score a couple quick ones to win.  I don’t think that strategy will work against Ottawa.  Both teams are very deep, Ottawa’s stars stack up a little better against Buffalo.  Buffalo’s third and fourth lines are a little better than Ottawa’s.  Goaltending is a wash, though if Emery struggles for some reason (or heaven forbid is hurt) having Gerber in the cupboard is much better than having Ty Conklin waiting to give away the game.  This one comes down to 1 game.  Game 7, home Ice, in Buffalo.  Buffalo has been there in a game seven and had it gone the other way (no whining now…)  they won’t let it happen again.

       Sabres in Seven

Western Conference

(1) Detroit Red Wings vs. (2) Anaheim Ducks

    I’m riding the ducks here.  I’ve been spot on about them each series even down to the number of games (though I did think Minnesota would win at least 1).  Detroit, who I thought was a soft fluffy team in an easy division, showed me something against the sharks.  They are a tough tough team.  I think the loss of Schneider will hurt them more than they know even with Linstrom and Chelios back there.  In all honesty if this one goes to 7 games I think the Red Wings have the Edge purely because of home ice advantage.  That being said the Ducks realize this and will push more to steal a road split in the beginning.  Personally I think this one comes down to goaltending (cliché).  Hasek has been awesome, but his tendency to roam and handle the puck hasn’t bit the Red Wings yet, and I think at some point it will.  Giguire has been great and has a better defense in front of him.  Ducks have to stay out of the box plain and simple.

       Ducks in Six

Categories: Hockey

Playoffs Round 2

April 25, 2007 Comments off

So in the First round I went 4-0 in the Eastern Conference and was correct on the number of games in 2 cases (Bufallo and New Jersey), the in Western Conference I was a paltry 1-4 but I was game number correct in that one game.  Now on to round 2.

(1) Buffalo Sabres vs. (6) New York Rangers
    The Islanders exposed something in Buffalo in the first series.  Either they took them too lightly or they aren’t showing the work effort needed to win.  Buffalo needs to get better or the Rangers will pick them apart.  The Rangers are playing smart, disciplined, determined hockey and they are confident right now.  They could steal this series, if Buffalo doesn’t step it up a notch.  I don’t think they will, Buffalo will coast a couple of games and the Rangers will give them a fight, but in the end Buffalo prevails and moves on.

       Sabres in Seven

(2) New Jersey Devils vs. (4) Ottawa Senators
    New Jersey (and Brodeur) took a couple of games off during the first series, but then Brodeur got his ass in gear and by association the rest of the team.  The Senators are a deeper offensive team, but not as sound defensively.  The Devils and managed to find a transition game and have Brodeur.  This one comes down to goaltending. 

       Devils in Seven

(1) Detroit Red Wings vs. (5) San Jose Sharks
    It took Detroit 6 games to dispatch a very ordinary looking Calgary team.  Sure they were more physical than Calgary but Calgary managed to muster like 3 shots a game on Hasek.  San Jose nullified Nashville (who was my pick for Western Conference Champ) pretty effectively and didn’t get a lot of scoring from the Thorton/Cheecho line.  San Jose is methodical and relentless, they just keep coming.

       Sharks in Six

(2) Anaheim Ducks vs. (3) Vancouver Canucks
    I thought the Wild’s suffocating defense could nullify the Ducks offense and they would win out being more used to winning low scoring games.  If it weren’t for a mercy game in their own building the Wild would have been swept.  Anaheim is a juggernaut, I was on the bandwagon during the Giguire losing run in 2003.

       Ducks in five

Categories: Hockey

I think I've got it

April 23, 2007 Leave a comment

I had a bit of an epiphany today, I was reading a post from John Forslund’s blog where he talks about diving.  Granted rules answers in hockey are never simple but here’s the plan.  Next season the league makes a deal about enforced crackdown of diving along with the continued Officiating Standard.  When a ref sees a hook, trip, etc but also sees a dive or embellishment, rather than not calling either (bad), or only calling one (ok, but still bad), he calls both.  Here’s the difference, it’s not a manpower penalty.  2 minutes each for each player, both sides skate 5-on-5.  The effect his has is potentially removing the two players for longer than two minutes.  Since teams are skating 5-on-5 the offending players can’t leave the penalty box until a stoppage in play.  This also has the effect of not altering the current play.  It’s still 5-on-5 rather than 4-on-4.  4-on-4 changes the game, there is more ice, coaches roll different lines, refs are less likely to call additional penalties since it would be 4-on-3 or 3-on-3 (which almost never happens).  It gives refs more of an out to a tough judgment call.  If either side is blatant with the hook or the dive, you could tack on another 2 minutes and give a powerplay.  It’s important to remove a diving player (and a hooking player) from the ice in punishment for the action, but not giving a 4-on-4 (which for some teams is a powerplay because of their skill) would go a long way to make it an easier infraction to enforce.

Categories: Hockey
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.